翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Oickle ・ R v Coney ・ R v Constanza ・ R v Cook ・ R v Coote ・ R v Coulson, Brooks and others ・ R v Creighton ・ R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd ・ R v Cuerrier ・ R v Cunningham ・ R v Darrach ・ R v Daviault ・ R v Davidson ・ R v Davis ・ R v DB ・ R v Dear ・ R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union ・ R v Dersch ・ R v DeSousa ・ R v District Auditor No 3 Audit District of West Yorkshire MCC, ex p West Yorkshire MCC ・ R v Dixon ・ R v Drybones ・ R v Du Plessis ・ R v Duarte ・ R v Dudley and Stephens ・ R v Dyment ・ R v Dytham ・ R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co ・ R v Edwards Books and Art Ltd ・ R v Evans Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Dear ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Dear ''R v Dear'' () Crim LR 595 is an English criminal law case, dealing with homicide and causation. The court ruled that even if a victim aggravates his wounds sufficiently to cause otherwise avoidable death, the chain of causation is not broken. ==Facts== The defendant was charged with the murder of the victim. It was alleged by the prosecution that the defendant's 12-year-old daughter had complained that victim had sexually assaulted her, whereupon defendant took a Stanley knife and slashed the victim repeatedly. The victim died two days later. Defendant claimed that there had been a break in the chain of causation because the victim had committed suicide following the attack, either by deliberately re-opening the wounds which had healed, or by failing to staunch the flow of blood from wounds which had reopened of their own accord. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Dear」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.